The mission of Fing’rs & Thu’ums is defined within us all. Bringing news to the masses in a manner that will include in-depth reporting, political and cultural commentary where relatable, fiction and humour, but most of all when content is both factual and researched.
The principles of Fing’rs & Thu’ums
- The first assignment of a media outlet is to tell the truth as nearly as the actuality may be determined, so far as it can study it, regarding the significant matters of the world.
- As a disseminator of the news, the outlet shall perceive the civilities that are compulsory upon a persons private life.
- The media outlet shall not be the supporter of any singular interest, but shall be reasonable and unrestricted and nourishing in its viewpoint on public affairs as well as public people.
These policies are meant to assist Fing’rs & Thu’ums journalism as we transport news and evidence in a rapidly changing media setting. This set of guidelines is considered to be a “living document” that will continually become modified and updated. This will be based on feedback from our journalists, readers, and our perceptions of our changing requirements. Because the situations under which material is obtained and reported vary extensively from one case to the next, these rules should not be taken as covering every situation that may arise.
Conflict of Interest
Fing’rs & Thu’ums is sworn to avoid conflicts of interest or the attendance of conflict of interest wherever and whenever conceivable. We have assumed rigorous strategies on these issues, mindful that they may be more preventive than is expected in the world of private business.
We will accept no bribery from anyone, for any means ever. Omissions to the no-gift rule are few and obvious — invites to meals, for instance, may be putative when they are infrequent and acquitted but not when they are recurrent and their determination is intentionally manipulative. We do not receive imbursement – either honoraria or expenditures – from governments or linked peoples or organisations nor organizations that take positions on contentious subjects. It is significant that no freelance projects and no honoraria be accepted that might in any way be understood as camouflaged perquisites. We make every sensible exertion to be free of responsibility to news sources and special interests. We must be suspicious of imbroglio with those whose locations render them likely to be themes of journalistic attention and inspection. Our secluded behaviour as well as our professional behaviour must not bring disgrace to our vocation or to Fing’rs & Thu’ums.
Reporters and editors of Fing’rs & Thu’ums are dedicated to impartiality. Whilst influences about impartiality are endless, the notion of equality is something that editors and reporters can effortlessly understand and pursue. Fairmindedness results from a few modest practices. No story is fair if it comprises fundamentally unconnected evidence at the disbursement of substantial truths. No story is reasonable if it neglects facts of chief importance or consequence. No story is fair if it covers persons or administrations that have not been given the chance to address declarations or claims about them made by others. No story is fair if it intentionally or unconsciously misinforms or even betrays the reader.
The parting of news columns from the editorial pages is earnest and comprehensive. This parting is envisioned to serve the reader, who is permitted to the truths in the news columns and to opinions on the editorial pages such as Console Yourself, Leigh Plays, Hi Five etc. But nought in this parting of purposes is projected to eradicate from the news columns honest, in-depth reporting, or examination or observation. The journalistic columns are wholly separate from the news and are premeditated as follows:
Console Yourself: A nostalgic overview of the life and experiences of the editor-in-chief Jim Cullinane, from an opinion-based perspective on experiences and life.
Leigh Plays: A nostalgic overview of the life and experiences of the content creator Michael Leigh Walsh, from an opinion-based perspective on experiences and life.
Hi Five: A column based on the personal ranking of items and themes by editor-in-chief Jim Cullinane.
This Week in Gaming: A factual but basic overview of anniversaries achieved in the gaming world based on dates and researched facts.
When using systems such as Facebook, Twitter etc., for reporting or for our personal lives, we must defend our professional veracity and recollect that Fing’rs & Thu’ums journalists are always Fing’rs & Thu’ums journalists.
Social-media accounts upheld by Fing’rs & Thu’ums journalists mirror upon the standing and trustworthiness of Fing’rs & Thu’ums. We must be ever wary of preserving the status of Fing’rs & Thu’ums for journalistic brilliance, equality and individuality. Every comment or link we share should be measured public information, irrespective of privacy settings. All linked social media accounts within the Fing’rs & Thu’ums outlet solely links to accounts maintained by Fing’rs & Thu’ums and not the sole reporter or journalist for this reason.
Fing’rs & Thu’ums journalists must refrain from writing, tweeting or posting anything that could quantitatively be professed as reflecting political, racial, sexist, religious or other bias or favouritism. In doing so their elimination from Fing’rs & Thu’ums will be prominent and with haste.
Authentication and standards
Fing’rs & Thu’ums reporters have chief accountability for reporting, writing, and fact-checking their stories. Stories are dependent on appraisal and evaluation by one or more editors. The number of editors who review a story in advance of publication and the degree of their participation differs dependent on a range of influences, including intricacy, sensitivity, and time pressures.
Fing’rs & Thu’ums is owned by James E. Cullinane. Fing’rs & Thu’ums was founded in 2020.
Fing’rs & Thu’ums strives for a sprightly, precise and whole news report. We venture to be punctually receptive in modifying mistakes in material available on digital platforms. When we run an alteration, explanation or editor’s note, our mission is to inform readers, as evidently and rapidly as conceivable, what was incorrect and what is precise. Everybody should be able to comprehend in what way and why a fault has been amended.
It is needless to put minutes on stories affirming that an article has been updated except there is a specific motive to note the addition of new evidence or other alteration. It is necessary to use an alteration, explanation or editor’s note to notify readers every time we correct a substantial error.
Editor’s Note Process
A rectification that calls into query the complete matter of an article, raises a substantial moral matter or addresses whether an article didn’t meet Fing’rs & Thu’ums standards, may necessitate an Editor’s Note and be shadowed by an elucidation of what is at question.
When our reporting is truthfully precise, but the language we used to clarify those facts is not as strong or thorough as it should be, the language should be rephrased and an amplification added to the story. An explanation can also be used to dictate that we originally failed to seek a remark or retort that has since been added or that new commentary has moved our explanation of an incident.
Policy on sources
Fing’rs & Thu’ums is dedicated to revealing to its readers the sources of the evidence in its stories to the maximum conceivable degree. We want to make our journalism as transparent to the readers as conceivable so they may know how and where we got our evidence.
In some conditions, we will have no choice but to grant privacy to sources. We distinguish that there are circumstances in which we can give our readers better, fuller evidence by allowing sources to continue unnamed than if we insist on naming them. We realize that in many conditions, sources will be reluctant to disclose to us evidence about exploitation in their own administrations, or high-level policy differences. Nevertheless, granting namelessness to a source should not be done nonchalantly or routinely. We prefer at least two sources for truthful information in Fing’rs & Thu’ums stories, where possible, that depends on private informers, and those sources should be independent of each other. We prefer sources with first-hand or immediate knowledge of the information.
We endeavour to treat sources justly, which means putting declarations we quote into context, and summarizing the arguments of people we quote in ways that are identifiably fair and precise, quoted in a complete sentence or paragraph when conceivable, and in context. In some cases, this will mean making clear what question was being answered when the declaration was made.
Our assignment in quoting people is to capture both their words and envisioned connotation precisely. That necessitates care in exchanging ground rules with sources. Sources cannot change the ground rules and once a quote is on the record, it remains there.
Plagiarism is not allowable. It is the rule of Fing’rs & Thu’ums to give praise to other periodicals that develop exclusive stories earnest of attention by Fing’rs & Thu’ums.
Public engagement and feedback
Fing’rs & Thu’ums welcomes engaged reader contributions as their inspection often advances our reporting.
Nearly all our articles contain comment sections for registered readers to converse the news of the day or deliver comments on our labour. Readers can also network with Fing’rs & Thu’ums via social media.
Reporters and editors are heartened to contribute in comments, but the degree of their contribution, if any, depends on their partialities. Readers and staff may report offensive comments to Jim Cullinane, editor-in-chief and owner of Fing’rs & Thu’ums via the contact us section.
Other ways to contact us:
- Questions can be emailed to the reader representatives at firstname.lastname@example.org.